IFJ Urges Maldivian Parliament to Withdraw Media Regulation Bill
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has called on the Maldivian Parliament to withdraw the proposed Maldives Media and Broadcasting Regulation Bill, citing serious risks to press freedom. The IFJ, together with its local affiliate, the Maldives Journalists Association (MJA), warned that the legislation could severely restrict journalism in the country.
In a joint statement released today, both organizations criticized the bill’s introduction, saying it bypassed meaningful consultation with journalists and media organizations. According to the IFJ, effective media regulation should involve the industry itself, rather than imposing rules from above.
“Regulating the media requires real dialogue with journalists and their unions. Ignoring this process shows a misunderstanding of the role of regulatory bodies. Their purpose is to strengthen journalism and protect democracy and press freedom,” the IFJ statement said.
Key Provisions of the Proposed Bill
The bill, introduced in Parliament on August 19 by Thinadhoo MP Abdul Hannan Abubakuru, proposes significant changes to Maldives’ media landscape. It seeks to dissolve both the Maldives Media Council (MMC) and the Maldives Broadcasting Commission, merging their functions into a single entity called the Maldives Media and Broadcasting Commission.
The new seven-member commission would have a mix of government and industry appointees. Three members would be appointed by the President with parliamentary approval, while four would be elected by media representatives. The President would also select the Chairperson of the commission, raising questions about its independence.
The bill gives the commission wide-ranging authority, including the ability to revoke journalist and media outlet registrations for violations of a new code of conduct. It also allows fines ranging from MVR 5,000 to MVR 25,000 (USD 325–1,620) for individual journalists and up to MVR 100,000 (USD 6,490) for media outlets.
Public and Industry Reactions
The bill’s first reading in Parliament took place yesterday and drew immediate protests from journalists inside and outside the building. Many media professionals expressed concern that the legislation’s vague wording could be used to suppress independent reporting.
Observers note that this is not the first attempt by the government to increase oversight of the media. A similar proposal in November 2024 faced strong criticism and was eventually withdrawn after widespread backlash.
The Maldives Media Council also released a statement urging Parliament to reconsider the bill. Alongside the IFJ and MJA, the council called for the legislation to be withdrawn before it reaches a stage that could threaten press independence.
Concerns About Press Freedom
Journalists say the bill could undermine the growth of free and independent media in the Maldives. They argue that allowing government-appointed officials to control registration and fines creates a system that could discourage critical reporting. Many have called for genuine consultations with media stakeholders before any legislation is passed.
The IFJ and MJA have stated that the Parliament should prioritize dialogue with the media to ensure that any new regulations support transparency, accountability, and press freedom, rather than limiting it.