The Maldives Journalists Association (MJA) has launched a petition urging the Maldivian parliament to reject the proposed “Maldives Media and Broadcasting Regulation” bill. The petition was announced yesterday, signaling strong opposition from the local media community.
The bill, tabled by independent parliamentarian Abdul Hannan Aboobakuru of Thulhaadhoo constituency, has drawn criticism from political parties, local media organizations, and international observers. Journalists have voiced concerns that the legislation poses a serious threat to press freedom in the country.
Concerns Over Media Freedom and Government Control
The MJA, along with the Maldives Media Council (MMC), has repeatedly highlighted that the draft law contains vague language, which could allow authorities to misuse the legislation. The associations argue that these provisions risk centralizing power under the President and undermining independent journalism.
According to the MJA, the bill includes measures that could allow the closure of media outlets, arrests of journalists, and the imposition of fines. The association has described the proposal as potentially creating a climate of fear within the Maldivian press and called it “the murder of independent journalism.”
Changes to Media Oversight Structures
Under the draft law, the Maldives Media Council and the Broadcasting Commission would be dissolved. Their functions would be transferred to a new Maldives Media and Broadcasting Commission, consisting of seven members. Three of these members would be appointed by the President, while four would be elected by the media sector. Unlike the current system, the new chairperson would be appointed directly by the head of state.
In response to criticism, President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu stated yesterday that he has requested parliamentarians from the People’s National Congress, who hold a supermajority, to amend the bill. He emphasized that the President would not directly appoint the commission’s chairperson.
Criticism from Media Organizations
The MMC has described the proposal as an attempt to weaken self-regulation and increase political influence over the media. The MJA has also condemned the lack of consultation with journalists during the drafting process.
The MJA further criticized Deputy Speaker Ahmed Nazim for allegedly playing a central role in shaping the bill, even though it was officially tabled by an independent MP. The association called this move suspicious and suggested that it could be politically motivated.
As debate around the bill continues, journalists remain firm in their call for its withdrawal. The petition launched by the MJA reflects mounting concern among media professionals who fear that the legislation could significantly curtail freedom of expression in the Maldives.
