The Maldives Journalists Association (MJA) has filed an appeal at the High Court against a controversial gag order issued by the Criminal Court concerning the Adhadhu documentary case.
The court order bars the circulation of the documentary and prohibits both the media and the public from discussing its contents, whether directly or indirectly. The decision has sparked growing concern among journalists and free speech advocates, with critics arguing that the restrictions undermine press freedom and the public’s right to information.
Criminal Court Order Sparks Debate
The gag order was issued following a request by the State, which is also seeking to file qazf charges against Adhadhu CEO Hussain Fiyaz Moosa and Editor Hassan Mohamed.
Under Islamic law, qazf refers to making false accusations of adultery or fornication. The charges have drawn significant public attention due to their seriousness and the wider implications for freedom of expression in the Maldives.
Legal observers say the case could become a major test of the balance between protecting reputations and safeguarding constitutional rights. For many in the media industry, the broader concern is not only the documentary itself, but the precedent such restrictions may create.
MJA Moves to Challenge Restrictions
Prominent lawyer Hassan Falah is leading the legal challenge on behalf of the MJA. According to the association, several lawyers are expected to represent the organization during court proceedings.
The MJA has also requested permission for individuals affected by the gag order to intervene in the case. The association argues that the court’s directive impacts not only journalists but also the wider public by limiting access to information and open discussion.
The appeal comes amid increasing criticism from local and international press freedom advocates, who say blanket restrictions on reporting can have a chilling effect on journalism.
Journalists Jailed for Alleged Breach
Meanwhile, two Adhadhu journalists have already been sentenced to prison for contempt of court over alleged violations of the gag order.
Journalist Leevan Ali Nasir was sentenced to 10 days in jail after reporting on the order, while Mohamed Shahzan received a 15-day sentence for asking a question related to the documentary during a recent presidential press conference after the restrictions had been imposed.
The detentions have intensified debate over the limits placed on media coverage in the Maldives. Critics argue that imprisoning journalists for reporting-related activities sends a troubling message to newsrooms across the country.
MJA Condemns Imprisonment of Reporters
In a statement released following the arrests, the MJA strongly condemned the imprisonment of the two journalists. The organization said the gag order effectively prevents reporters from carrying out their duties and restricts the public’s constitutional right to receive information.
“The gag order restricting freedom of speech and the media doesn't meet the three-part test of legality, necessity and proportionality required by the Maldivian Constitution and the Maldives' international obligations,” the association said in its statement.
The case is now expected to proceed at the High Court, where the legality and scope of the gag order will likely face closer judicial scrutiny. Media organizations and civil society groups are expected to closely monitor the outcome, as it may shape future discussions on press freedom and judicial limits on reporting in the Maldives.
